Some ODM supporters have questioned the logic behind calls for a handover, noting that the party already has established leadership terms and internal accountability systems.
They argued that demanding an immediate transfer undermines internal democracy and risks portraying the party as fragile or divided at a time when unity is critical.
Following the remarks, many Kenyans took to online forums arguing that the time may be ripe for a fresh political outfit driven by youth energy, accountability, and grassroots mobilisation.
Supporters say Babu Owino’s bold approach to political issues have set him apart in a landscape often dominated by scripted leadership.
The proponents added that Kenya’s political space is ready for disruption.
They claim existing parties have become rigid, personality driven, and disconnected from everyday struggles such as unemployment, high living costs, and access to opportunities for young people.
For them, a new party would offer an alternative platform focused on reform, social justice, and generational change.
The calls gained momentum after critics challenged Owino to “form his own party” instead of pushing for changes within established political structures.
Rather than dismissing the idea, supporters embraced it, framing a potential new movement as a chance to reset political engagement and give voice to a demographic that often feels sidelined.
However, not all reactions have been positive. Some cautioned that forming a new party is a complex and resource intensive process that requires nationwide structures, discipline, and long term strategy.
They warn that personality driven movements risk fading quickly if not backed by strong ideology and organization.
Others argued that Babu Owino’s influence within existing political formations remains significant and that his energy could still shape reform from within.
Still, the growing online chatter suggests a segment of the public is increasingly open to new political alignments ahead of future elections.
