In a tweet shared widely on social media, Natembeya highlighted a contrast with previous leaders. "When Moi was in power, he never held KANU meetings at State House.
When Kibaki was in power, he never held PNU meetings at State House. When Uhuru was in power, he never held Jubilee meetings at State House," he stated.
The governor argued that past presidents maintained State House as a neutral national institution, avoiding its use for partisan gatherings to preserve its dignity and role as a symbol of unity.
The criticism follows reports of President Ruto hosting a large number of UDA aspirants estimated in the thousands at State House ahead of upcoming electoral processes.
Such events have included party mobilisations and discussions on nominations, drawing attention to the blending of official and political functions at the presidential residence.
Natembeya's remarks echo broader concerns raised by commentators, including veteran journalist Linus Kaikai, who recently urged that State House remain a space for state affairs rather than routine party business.
Critics contend that frequent partisan use risks eroding public perception of impartiality and institutional sanctity.
Previous administrations, while engaging in politics, reportedly favoured alternative venues like Sagana State Lodge or other facilities for large party meetings, reserving State House primarily for diplomatic engagements, national ceremonies, and governance matters.
The Trans Nzoia governor's comments come amid ongoing political tensions, as he has been vocal on various national issues.
No immediate response has been issued from State House or UDA officials addressing the specific allegations.
State House, a historic symbol of Kenyan leadership, continues to host diverse activities under the current administration.
Observers note that such debates highlight tensions between political strategy and the traditional expectations of presidential neutrality in a multi-party democracy.
